Amazon Basics Cavo di ricarica rapida da USB-C a USB-C 2.0 in nylon a doppia treccia, 3 A - 3 piedi, grigio scuro, laptop 3 piedi USB-C 2.0 a ricarica rapida, 3 A grigio scuro

Name: Amazon Basics Cavo di ricarica rapida da USB-C a USB-C 2.0 in nylon a doppia treccia, 3 A - 3 piedi, grigio scuro, laptop 3 piedi USB-C 2.0 a ricarica rapida, 3 A grigio scuro
Brand: Amazon Basics
SKU: 0192233024325
Price: 38.83 EUR
Availability: InStock

Brand:Amazon Basics

3.6/5

€
38.83

DESCRIZIONE PRODOTTO Amazon Basics Cavo di ricarica rapida da USB-C a USB-C 2.0 in nylon a doppia treccia, 3 A - 3 piedi, grigio scuro DAL PRODUTTORE Amazon Basics

Prodotto non disponibile

EAN: 0192233024325

Categories: Elettronica, Computer e accessori, Accessori per computer, Cavi e interconnessioni, Cavi USB,

CONFORME A USB 2.0: Certificato da USB-IF per essere compatibile con USB 2.0. DESIGN REVERSIBILE: inserisci facilmente il connettore in qualsiasi dispositivo abilitato per il tipo C (non importa quale lato sia rivolto verso l'alto). FATTO DUREVOLE: il tessuto in fibra di nylon intrecciato offre protezione, resistenza e flessibilità; ulteriore strato di protezione per una maggiore durata e per ridurre lo sfilacciamento; i cavi sono stati testati per piegarsi a 95 gradi 5.000 volte. ULTRA VELOCE: supporta la ricarica rapida USB PD fino a 60 W 20 V/3 A; carica telefoni e laptop con porte USB C ad alta velocità; supporta velocità di trasferimento dati fino a 480Mbps. AMPIA COMPATIBILITÀ: il cavo da USB C a USB C 2.0 consente di collegare tutti i dispositivi abilitati USB Type-C (MacBook, Chromebook Pixel, Galaxy Note 7, ecc.) con dispositivi e accessori abilitati USB Type-C 2.0 standard (smartphone, caricabatterie per auto/parete, adattatori multiporta, ecc.). NELLA CONFEZIONE: (1) Cavo di ricarica rapida da 3 piedi da USB-C a USB-C 2.0.

AC Adapter Current	‎3 Amps
Brand	Amazon Basics
Brand	‎Amazon Basics
Cable Type	USB
Cable Type	‎USB
Color	‎Dark Grey
Compatible Devices	Laptop
Compatible Devices	‎Laptop
Connector Gender	‎Male-to-Male
Connector Type	USB Type C
Connector Type	‎USB Type C
Country of Origin	‎China
Customer Reviews	4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 20,325 ratings 4.6 out of 5 stars
Data Transfer Rate	‎0.48 Gigabits Per Second
Item Dimensions LxWxH	‎36 x 0.14 x 0.14 inches
Item model number	‎UTC-C-C-2.0-3FT-GRY
Item Weight	‎0.05 Pounds
Item Weight	‎0.816 ounces
Manufacturer	‎Amazon Basics
Number of Items	‎1
Package Type	‎Standard Packaging
Product Dimensions	‎36 x 0.14 x 0.14 inches
Series	‎USB 2.0 Fast Charging Cable - Nylon
Special Feature	Fast Charging
Special Feature	‎Fast Charging
Unit Count	‎1 Count

5 Star

4 Star

3 Star

2 Star

1 Star

Scrivi la tua recensione

La tua mail non sarà pubblicata. Tutti i campi obbligatori sono segnati con^*

La tua valutazione

Scritto da: Kindle Customer

Supports 60W charging; buy the shortest cable you can!

I bought the 1-foot version of this cable specifically because it was noted to allow 3A (60W) charging and support up to 10Gbps connectivity. This has become my go-to cable for phone swaps/migrations. I measured the resistance of the cable relative to the USB standards (for more information see the medium page from Benson Leung titled "What does it mean when a USB-C™ cable is rated at 3A?"). According to the specification, the wire resistance limit for supporting 3A/60W would be 0.166Ω for the voltage carrying line (Vbus/Vcc) and 0.0833Ω for the ground line. Fortunately the measured resistances of this cable are both well below the limits documented above: 0.158Ω for the voltage carrying line (Vbus/Vcc) and 0.06Ω for the ground line. Achieving such values are easier for shorter cables, but shouldn't be taken for granted as I have plenty of cables from reputable brands (some of which were USB-IF listed) which still failed to meet the spec. This is noteworthy because I later I bought the 10-foot version of this cable based upon my good experience withthe 1-foot version of the same AmazonBasics cable . While I'll focus on the positives for this long cable first, read to the end if you're specifically shopping for a 10-foot 3A / 60W capable USB-C cable. One high point is the USB-C connector. Both cables feature an extruded design unlike the stamped and folded connectors that are common in, for example, the free cable included with my most recent Samsung phone (my Pixel 6 and iPhone 12, in contrast, both included cables with the more premium extruded USB-C connector). Continuing on the premium elements in this cable's favor, the strain relief on the connector is a nice design and the cable itself is both smooth and flexible. I'd contrast this cable's flexibility witha less expensive and simpler 10-foot AmazonBasics cable which probably suffers by comparison in part due to the way they're packed/shipped. The more premium cable is shipped in a larger, loose coil, whereas the cheaper cable was shipped in a box a third the size resulting in a cable that still has many of the kinks reflective of the time spent tightly wound inside the shipping box. There was disappointment, but no real surprise for a cable of this length, once I measured the resistance of the cable relative to the USB standards (once again, for more information see the medium page from Benson Leung titled "What does it mean when a USB-C™ cable is rated at 3A?"). According to the specification, the wire resistance limit for supporting 3A/60W would be 0.166Ω for the voltage carrying line (Vbus/Vcc) and 0.0833Ω for the ground line. The cable does *allow* 3A (60W) charging, however... The value I measured for the 10 foot cable's ground line was under the 0.0833Ω limit, being 0.061Ω (lower is better). Unfortunately, the value I measured for this cable's voltage carrying line was over the 0.166Ω limit at 0.230Ω. This would suggest that optimally (to keep the amount of voltage drop over the cable within the spec) this cable should be carrying no more than about 2.2A of current. That would make this cable optimal for something like a 45W load, but technically out of spec for a 60W load. The end result for any users connecting a 60W load would likely be slowed charging at maximum load. Achieving such values are easier for shorter cables, but I also have a USB-IF listed 8 foot cable purchased at a big box store which also manages to be well within the 3A spec. That the 10-foot cable failed to reach the 3A/60W spec was disappointing but perhaps not surprising when you take length and price into consideration. The 10-foot version of the cable is functional but its use should be limited to devices with lower (<=45W) power demands. I measured the resistance values using a USB-C breakout to facilitate separate measurement of the ground and voltage lines. However, the issue I'm describing is visible using simple meters like the ones I've attached in the pictures. A cable that is in spec for 3A/60W power delivery should cause no more than 0.50V drop (i.e. - 500 mV) across the cable. At 1.65A the 1-foot cable is causing a mere 0.20V drop, suggesting that at 3A the voltage drop would still be well under 0.50V (at around 0.36V using V=IR to solve for the value of R with the initial measurements, then substituting in the value of R determined for the cable and 3 for the value of I). A similarly small drop is experienced over my big box store's 8-foot cable (the black cable in the photos), suggesting it is also within spec for a 3A cable. However, notice that for the silver 10-foot cable the voltage drop at a similar 1.67A is almost 0.32V. That would estimate the voltage drop for a 3A load well over the 0.50V limit at around 0.57V. That voltage drop is basically power that would never make it to your charging device.

Scritto da: J. Pusch

Durable and lasts years!

This lasted almost 4 years with heavy usage. Great product and saved me more than $60 when considering buying an entire charging unit from Apple. I just bought this again, I expect it to last at least another 3-4 years… It’s strong, tough, and so cheap. Highly recommend.

Scritto da: Kevin P.

Great, high quality cable. Really large and long connector boot may cause problems for some.

I bought this cable looking for a good, high quality build, USB-C cable to use for charging my Pixel 2 XL and my girlfriends first gen Pixel on long road trips with my Aukey car charger. I had been using RAVPower cables for a bit and while they worked pretty good for charging, they were a bit too long for long term use in a vehicle without using a cable tie or something similar to bunch up the excess cable. I found that I was going through them a bit too quickly for my liking (About 5 or so in the last 2 years) and decided to look for one that was maybe a bit shorter, better build quality, or both. Since the price was pretty good and I would mostly be using the cable for charging and not transferring data, I decided to try the AmazonBasics USB Type-C to USB Type-C 2.0 Cable to see how they fared, and while it was a nice cable for the cost, one of the issues that immediately stood out was the material the cable was made from. I live in Minnesota and for about 4 months or so of the year the temperatures can be downright frigid. While I never had any issues with the RAVPower cables, the regular USB 2.0 USB-C AmazonBasics cord was super rigid when it was cold. In fact it was so rigid, I was worried that bending it might cause some excess stress on it and possibly cause a short or break off a connector accidentally if there were any unintended sudden movements or too much side pressure applied. I decided to look for a high quality cable and saw these, the AmazonBasics Double Braided Nylon USB Type-C to Type-C 3.1 Gen 2 Cable. While the cost was a little more than double over the other AmazonBasics cable, I decided it was worth the cost difference to try since it was USB 3.1 spec for data transfer speeds. The cable build quality is amazing. Compared to the RAVPower and other AmazonBasics USB-C cables, its a totally different beast. Its like comparing a Dodge Neon to a BMW M5. Not only is the build quality on a different plane of existence, the speeds are too. However, I will say that there may be a drawback to these cables for some people as the connector sheath/boots on this cable are HUGE. I dont have the cable here while I write this review, but I can say that the ends of the cable and the boots are more than double the length of any other USB-C cable I have seen. While I'm sure that helps for physical protection (and maybe shielding), it is heavier on the ends of the cable so depending on usage, it might put more stress on your connectors than you were expecting, or they may simply be too long if trying to use it to connect to something with very little space between the connector and an obstruction like a wall or mount, etc. Just keep that in mind when purchasing. If I can I will edit this review in the future with photos and measurements for comparison.

Scritto da: Amazon Customer

decent

The cord is sturdy but the charging port is shorter than others which makes me have to take my case off in order for it to connect fully. Little inconvenience.

Scritto da: CW

Does the job

Get it

Scritto da: Trecia Miller

Great product

Love the color and length

Scritto da: Practical Gamer

Durability and length for what's needed!

This is what I was looking for in a product. The color is great and matches my phone case.

Scritto da: Amazon Customer

Great Dupe

Works just as well as an Apple cord. Very durable material as well.

Scritto da: Vivek Bessetti

Do not waste your money

Been 6 weeks since I bought this product; stopped working abruptly 2 days ago. Tried calling amazon they said a replacement can't happen. Finally spoke to someone who asked me to contact Amazon basis separately. Spoke to them and they said that I have to email to claim warranty. I would recommend going for more recognised and well established brands unlike Amazon Basics. Still waiting for a response from Amazon basics. Edit: Been over 9 months. Never got a repair done. Didn't get a replacement either. Have over 75 email exchanges that led to nothing.

Scritto da: Londoner

Expected to provide faster data transfers than USB 3.0, but isn't!

It is widely claimed that USB-C offers twice the data transfer speeds of USB 3.0; typically, speeds of 160 MB/s up to 195 MB/s can be seen with an expectation that this will allow 300-400 MB/s. It doesn't and comes nowhere close. It was transferring data at no more than 35-40 MB/s over several minutes, just 1/10th of expectations. Although, never needing to use USC-C-to-USB-C data transfers at home until now, transfers of data in other locations using other similar cables had seen much better performance levels. Numerous AmazonBasics cables of various types have been purchased and used for years with complete satisfaction. This is the first not to achieve what was expected from it and it was soon returned for another that fared no better.

Scritto da: varkey

Charges a Macbook Pro but only at ~60w

The cable is sturdy and definitely looks like it would last long. It's a bit stiff unlike Apple's original cable. For the price (Rs 600 or so that paid) can't go wrong, when Apple wants Rs 2000+ for their cable and it isn't really available easily either. However this cable charges at a max of around 64w (yes I tested with a power meter), however even Apple's 1m cable (which is actually rated for the iPad with an 18w power adapter) when connected to a 87w power adapter, charges my mac at around 85w. I guess this isn't really an issue, just that it would charge the mac a tiny bit slower than your original cable. (Please note the image is just to show the max power draw with this cable connected to an Apple 87w power adapter and a Macbook Pro (2018)) I'm revising my rating as the listing had clearly said it supports max 3A current which it's delivering. To charge faster than this, would need to get cable rated for 5A.

Scritto da: FootballPlayingKitten

Good cable does pass PD and QC

Ordinarily you don't want long cables carrying DC due to losses (needs to be thicker the longer it is in order to keep voltage drops low) but you cannot bring the charger closer - then you can do worse than this. It is not cheap and AZ seems a bit coy about the AWG rating of their power leads inside the cable (likely AWG22-23?) while some brands may specify AWG20 but with high voltages in PD/QC you can get away with less thicker wires as you're not pumping 3A @ 5V (or I hope you are not). I've only tested it for 36W or so loads - not laptops - and it does work at that rating without getting hot but for higher loads (50W+) I would thoroughly test before deployment.

Scritto da: Mr. Jonathan Jones

Great for extending range of MacBook Pro power brick to laptop

I bought this for two reasons. The first was that I don't like using the original cables that come with any devices as I feel they're expensive to replace and probably are built to not last as long leading to expensive replacement cost. The second reason is that the cable that came with my MacBook Pro 2018 was a standard size / length one provided by Apple and given that I am used to my old MacBook Pro having a power brick attached to an extension portion of cable giving me 3 meters from socket to MacBook this cable was the ideal solution. I can sit further away from the power outlet now and the beauty of having a USB C cable to power my MacBook Pro is that should this cable get damaged as often can happen with things in constant use, the replacement cost involves just replacing the cable, whereas before a damaged power adapter cable meant replacing a very expensive power adapter brick / whole unit.